Bitcoin’s Corporate Case Depends on Clearer Control of Funds
Questions over who controls corporate bitcoin, who authorizes transfers and whether assets remain in place could slow wider business adoption, according to Onramp CEO Michael Tanguma.
By Chloe ·

For companies considering bitcoin, the central challenge may be less about whether they can acquire the asset and more about whether they can demonstrate how it is governed. Questions about control, approval and continued access to funds can become material obstacles when digital assets are held on a corporate balance sheet.
Governance is part of the custody question
Onramp CEO Michael Tanguma argues that corporate adoption will stall unless companies can show who controls their bitcoin, who is authorized to move it and whether the assets are still where they are expected to be. Those questions connect custody to internal governance: a company needs a clear record of responsibility before it can provide confidence to the people overseeing its finances.
The concern also extends beyond the act of buying bitcoin. Corporate ownership requires procedures that make access and movement understandable to decision-makers. Without that clarity, a company may face uncertainty over who can approve a transaction, how that approval is documented and how the organization can confirm that its holdings remain under its control.
Why the issue matters for adoption
Bitcoin’s corporate use therefore depends on more than market access or interest in the asset. It also depends on whether companies can fit bitcoin into existing expectations around accountability. A governance framework that identifies control and approval responsibilities gives stakeholders a way to assess how funds are managed, rather than treating custody as an opaque technical function.
The allegations referenced in the discussion highlight that gap, but the available account does not provide details about the specific claims or the parties involved. Its broader point is that unresolved questions around corporate control can affect adoption even when a company is willing to hold bitcoin. Until businesses can clearly explain who controls the money, who may move it and how its continued presence is verified, corporate participation may remain constrained.
Source: Coindesk

