Binance Pool’s Mining Power Drops Sharply Ahead of Closure
Computing power directed to Binance Pool has fallen from 26 EH/s in December to about 9 EH/s, leaving its remaining miners to find another provider before a Nov. 10 cutoff.
By Chloe ·

Binance Pool is winding down after a steep decline in the computing power supporting its Bitcoin mining operations. Hashrate directed to the pool has dropped from 26 exahashes per second (EH/s) in December to about 9 EH/s, a reduction of roughly 65%.
The pool had previously handled about 2.3% of Bitcoin’s network hashrate, according to the source material. Its remaining miners must move to another mining-pool provider before a Nov. 10 cutoff.
What the hashrate decline means
Hashrate measures the computing power being used to perform the calculations required for Bitcoin mining. A mining pool combines the resources of multiple miners, giving participants a shared route to compete for block rewards rather than operating entirely on their own.
A decline in the hashrate assigned to one pool does not by itself mean that the miners have stopped operating. In this case, the remaining participants have been directed to select a different provider before Binance Pool’s cutoff. Their machines can continue contributing computing power through another pool, subject to the terms and availability of that service.
A transition for remaining miners
The closure changes where those miners coordinate their activity and receive their pool-related payouts. It also removes a pool that had represented a measurable, though relatively small, portion of Bitcoin’s overall mining activity.
The available information does not identify why Binance Pool’s hashrate fell from December’s level or specify which alternative providers are being considered. The immediate operational issue is the Nov. 10 deadline: miners that remain with the service must make a new arrangement before then.
For Bitcoin market observers, the episode illustrates how quickly mining hashrate can shift between pool operators. The network’s total computing power is distributed across miners and providers, so a change at one pool primarily affects the allocation of that activity unless the miners themselves also leave the network.
Source: Coindesk

