It goes without saying that current and future legislation will have a significant impact on NFTs. While this is true of virtually all commercial industries, his burgeoning NFT sector is particularly susceptible to the law.

This is largely because NFTs are based on relatively new blockchain technology, which has proven to be divided among consumers and legislators. Some companies are totally supportive of NFTs, others are totally against them, and recent lawsuits and regulations unfolding related to NFTs could put the future of the industry at stake.

a series of strange incidents

Last year, fashion watchers and NFT fans were fascinated by a lawsuit filed by fashion house Hermes against NFT creator Mason Rothschild, which was first filed in 2022. The reason for these legal actions is that Rothschild called the “Meta Birkin.” is.

This was done without the permission of the fashion house, who, of course, tried to block their sale. The lawsuit sparked a heated debate over trademarks and how they relate to NFTs. Did Rothschild have the rights to create the NFTs even though he had no connection with the bag maker, or was it a case of infringement?But in early February, a jury decided that Rothschild Child’s activities were indeed copyright infringement.

What Legislation Means for the Future of NFTs

As with the first case, the ruling sparked debate online, primarily over whether it was fair. What does this mean for the industry? It’s no secret that many NFT collections are derivative works.

A quick look at the major NFT marketplaces reveals collections based on popular culture and some well-known brands. Many of them are distributed without explicit permission from the trademark owner. After all, NFTs are partly built on online and fan culture, much of it through spoofs, memes, and direct influences from others.

This is to the point that there are obviously NFTs based on others.file an ongoing lawsuit Yuga LabRyder Ripps, creator of Bored Ape Yacht Club, and Ryder Ripps, the artist who created RR/BAYC. His famous controversy with Yuga Labs, Mr. Ripps, says that his work, which looks and sounds very similar to the Bored Ape Club, is a parody and protected by law. The case is still in court and has not yet been resolved.

Then there is the debate about what NFTs are in the first place. For years, cryptocurrencies have been the subject of the same debate. Are they securities? Are they investment tools? NBA Top Shot, a popular marketplace for his basketball-themed NFT content, is set to face a class action lawsuit alleging that the company’s NFTs are securities. NBA Topshot tried to dismiss the lawsuit, but a judge ruled that some of the assets offered by the company were actually securities.

“Ultimately, the court’s conclusion that Dapper Labs was the investment contract under Howey was narrowly defined. must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis,” said Judge Victor Malleo.

What Legislation Means for the Future of NFTs

Meaning of these cases

On the surface, these all look like unrelated lawsuits floating in the NFT space. But look deeper and you’ll see they’re shaping the future of NFTs as we know them. As NFTs achieve more mainstream success, they need to move beyond their roots as semi-obscure blockchain-based assets.

To do this, it is necessary to set legal parameters and this is done through the following laws: This law is inevitably shaped by the precedents we have seen. Consider the Hermes v. Rothschild case. Not only does that ruling mean that Rothschild himself cannot make his Hermès-themed NFTs for sale, but in the future, companies will hire his NFT creators to create similar collections of digital assets. You will get legal help to track it down.

The NBA Topshot ruling does not simply mean that Dapper Labs (its parent company) will have to face imminent lawsuits; This means that NFTs are subject to the law if they are actually securities. It has the potential to impact existing securities laws and will have significant ramifications for the industry.

So when legal boundaries are drawn around NFT’s trademark (as was the case with Yuga Labs and Ryder Ripps), it will lead to more lawsuits within the industry. Thus, creating an industry standard that determines what these lawsuits can and cannot do within the NFT sector.

There is a reason blockchain-related lobbying and regulation has been a hot issue for years. Just one law could completely overthrow his existing NFT project business model, one lawsuit precedent and he could unlock 1,000 locks.

This means that as stakeholders in the NFT industry, it is imperative that we advocate for NFT-friendly regulation and keep abreast of the regulation as it unfolds.

want more? Connect with NFT Plaza

Join our weekly newsletter
Join Discord
follow me on twitter
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Instagram

*All investment/financial opinions expressed by NFT PLAZA are based on the personal research and experience of the site moderators and are intended for educational material only. , the product should be thoroughly investigated.

By Jules

Leave a Reply